|
deux / dos vs duo, duae
|
|
10-30-2009, 04:38 PM
Post: #11
|
|||
|
|||
RE: deux / dos vs duo, duae
(10-30-2009 02:43 PM)Sergio Wrote: Instead of disproving my interpretation you confirmed it by adding only additional info abt intermediary stage of transformation L > [ɫ] > u [w].Yes, I misread your post as saying that this final X descends from an earlier L. I'm sorry for confusing you and others.
Robo-Puppy commencing two hour yipping session. Yip yip yip yip yip yip... |
|||
|
11-07-2009, 04:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-07-2009 04:09 PM by Belg.)
Post: #12
|
|||
|
|||
| RE: deux / dos vs duo, duae | |||
|
11-08-2009, 12:05 PM
Post: #13
|
|||
|
|||
RE: deux / dos vs duo, duae
(11-07-2009 04:08 PM)Belg Wrote: Was it in French? When did it appear? When did it disappear?Unfortunately, I'm not an expert on this subject. Perhaps you should refer to the wikipedia acticle on the history of French and its list of references for further details. Quote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_...50-1300_AD Robo-Puppy commencing two hour yipping session. Yip yip yip yip yip yip... |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|

Search
Member List
Calendar
Help



