Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
deux / dos vs duo, duae
10-30-2009, 04:38 PM
Post: #11
RE: deux / dos vs duo, duae
(10-30-2009 02:43 PM)Sergio Wrote:  Instead of disproving my interpretation you confirmed it by adding only additional info abt intermediary stage of transformation L > [ɫ] > u [w].
Yes, I misread your post as saying that this final X descends from an earlier L. I'm sorry for confusing you and others. Blush

Robo-Puppy commencing two hour yipping session. Yip yip yip yip yip yip...
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-07-2009, 04:08 PM (This post was last modified: 11-07-2009 04:09 PM by Belg.)
Post: #12
RE: deux / dos vs duo, duae
(10-30-2009 10:15 AM)paqra Wrote:  Velarized L
Was it in French? When did it appear? When did it disappear?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2009, 12:05 PM
Post: #13
RE: deux / dos vs duo, duae
(11-07-2009 04:08 PM)Belg Wrote:  Was it in French? When did it appear? When did it disappear?
Unfortunately, I'm not an expert on this subject. Perhaps you should refer to the wikipedia acticle on the history of French and its list of references for further details.
Quote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_...50-1300_AD

Through Late Old French, c. 1250-1300 AD

/l/ before consonant becomes /w/

Robo-Puppy commencing two hour yipping session. Yip yip yip yip yip yip...
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.


Image Verification
Image Verification
(case insensitive)
Please enter the text within the image on the left in to the text box below. This process is used to prevent automated posts.

Forum Jump: